MEDICAL RESEARCH | RESEARCH SKILLS | BEGINNER'S GUIDE
How to Start Medical Research: From a Clinical Problem to a Research Question
1. Research Begins with a Problem, Not a Questionnaire
One common mistake among beginner researchers is starting with data collection tools before identifying exactly what they want to investigate. A questionnaire, laboratory test, or patient interview is not the beginning of a research project. These are methods used to collect information after the research problem has been clearly defined. Consider a simple clinical situation. A medical student working in a hospital notices that several patients with diabetes have poor blood glucose control. The student becomes interested in understanding why this happens. At this stage, there is an observation, but not yet a complete research question. Possible explanations may include: - Difficulty accessing medications. - Poor adherence to prescribed treatment. - Limited knowledge about diabetes. - Inadequate follow-up. - Financial or social barriers. The researcher must decide which aspect can realistically be investigated. For example, the broad topic "diabetes" could be narrowed to: Factors associated with poor glycaemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes attending a particular hospital. This is more focused because it identifies a population, a clinical issue, and the general relationship being investigated. The first lesson is simple: a good research project does not begin by collecting as much information as possible. It begins by identifying the right problem.2. How Do You Choose a Research Topic?
A research topic may emerge from clinical experience, public health concerns, previous scientific publications, or unanswered questions in medical practice. However, an interesting topic is not automatically a suitable research project. Before selecting a topic, consider the following:A. Clinical importance
Does the problem matter to patients, healthcare workers, or the healthcare system? A topic involving delayed diagnosis, treatment complications, preventable disease, or poor access to healthcare may have practical importance.B. Availability of information
Can you access relevant patients, medical records, laboratory results, or published literature? A project may be scientifically interesting but impossible to complete if the required data are unavailable.C. Personal interest
Research takes time and persistence. Choosing a subject that genuinely interests the research team can help maintain motivation throughout the project.D. A knowledge gap
What is not yet sufficiently understood? Perhaps previous studies have examined a condition in large urban hospitals, but little information is available from rural healthcare facilities. This may provide a reason to investigate the same issue in a different setting.3. From a Broad Topic to a Specific Research Question
Imagine that you are interested in hypertension. The topic is important, but "hypertension" is too broad to guide a complete study. You could investigate: - Prevalence of hypertension. - Awareness of hypertension. - Medication adherence. - Factors associated with uncontrolled blood pressure. - Complications among patients with hypertension. Each option represents a different research direction. Compare these examples:Hypertension among adults.
More focused:Medication adherence among adults diagnosed with hypertension.
More specific:What is the level of medication adherence among adults with hypertension attending the outpatient clinic of Hospital X during a defined study period?
4. Use PICO to Structure Clinical Research Questions
One of the most widely used frameworks for developing focused clinical questions is PICO. PICO stands for:| Component | Meaning | Question to ask |
|---|---|---|
| P | Patient or Population | Who is being studied? |
| I | Intervention or Exposure | What treatment, intervention, or exposure is being investigated? |
| C | Comparison | What is it being compared with? |
| O | Outcome | What result will be measured? |
Example: Comparing two treatments
Suppose a researcher wants to investigate whether Treatment A produces better blood pressure control than Treatment B. The question can be structured as follows:- P: Adults with hypertension.
- I: Treatment A.
- C: Treatment B.
- O: Blood pressure control.
5. What If Your Study Is Descriptive?
An important point: PICO is not compulsory for every research project. Consider a student planning a descriptive cross-sectional study about low back pain. The aim may be to describe the clinical characteristics of patients attending a hospital rather than compare two treatments. A suitable research question could be: What are the clinical characteristics of patients presenting with low back pain at Hospital X during the study period? For descriptive studies, the researcher may focus on:- The population being studied.
- The condition or phenomenon of interest.
- The location or healthcare setting.
- The period of observation, when relevant.
- The characteristics or outcomes to be described.
6. Evaluate Your Question Using FINER
After developing a possible research question, how do you know whether it is worth investigating? A useful framework is FINER.| Letter | Criterion | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| F | Feasible | Can the study realistically be completed with available time, skills, participants, and resources? |
| I | Interesting | Is the question interesting to the researcher and relevant scientific audience? |
| N | Novel | Does it contribute new information or a useful perspective? |
| E | Ethical | Can the study be conducted while protecting participants' rights and safety? |
| R | Relevant | Could the findings matter to clinical practice, public health, or future research? |
Applying FINER to a real example
Suppose a student wants to investigate medication adherence among patients with hypertension at a local hospital. Feasible: Are enough eligible patients available? Is there sufficient time to collect the data? Interesting: Does the question address an issue that the research team genuinely wants to understand? Novel: Has this population or setting been studied before? Could the study provide useful local information? Ethical: Can informed consent, confidentiality, and appropriate ethical approval be ensured? Relevant: Could the results help healthcare professionals identify barriers to treatment adherence? If the question fails one or more of these criteria, it may need to be modified before the project begins.7. Research Question vs Research Objective vs Hypothesis
These three terms are related, but they are not interchangeable.Research question
This is the question that the study is designed to answer. Example: What is the level of medication adherence among adults with hypertension attending Hospital X?Research objective
This describes what the researcher intends to achieve. Example: To assess the level of medication adherence among adults with hypertension attending Hospital X.Research hypothesis
A hypothesis is a testable statement predicting a relationship or difference. Example: Poor medication adherence is associated with uncontrolled blood pressure among adults with hypertension. A hypothesis is particularly relevant to many analytical and experimental studies. Descriptive and exploratory studies do not necessarily require a formal hypothesis.Research question = What do I want to find out?
Objective = What do I intend to do?
Hypothesis = What relationship or result do I predict?
8. Conduct a Preliminary Literature Search
Before finalizing your question, search for existing scientific evidence. The purpose is not simply to collect references. You need to understand what is already known, how previous researchers investigated the problem, and what remains uncertain. Useful sources include:- PubMed — biomedical and life sciences literature.
- Google Scholar — broad academic literature searching.
- Cochrane Library — systematic reviews and evidence synthesis.
- World Health Organization — public health information and technical guidance.
- Hypertension AND medication adherence.
- Antihypertensive adherence AND blood pressure control.
- Medication adherence AND Sudan.
- Barriers to hypertension treatment AND outpatient clinics.
9. Common Mistakes Made by Beginner Researchers
1. Choosing a topic that is too broad. A large topic may be difficult to investigate within the available time and resources. Narrow it by population, setting, outcome, or study period. 2. Starting data collection too early. Collecting information before defining the research question can produce unnecessary variables and an unclear methodology. 3. Confusing association with causation. Finding an association between two variables does not automatically prove that one causes the other. Interpretation must consider the study design and possible confounding factors. 4. Ignoring previous studies. Without reviewing the literature, researchers may repeat work unnecessarily or overlook important methodological problems. 5. Selecting an unrealistic question. A project requiring expensive laboratory investigations, long follow-up, or unavailable participants may not be feasible for a student research team. 6. Writing objectives that do not match the question. The research objectives, methods, data collection, and analysis should all be aligned with the main research question.10. A Practical Exercise: Develop Your First Research Question
Imagine that you are a medical student working in a general outpatient clinic. You notice that many patients with diabetes have difficulty achieving good glycaemic control. Follow these steps:- Identify the problem: Poor glycaemic control among patients with diabetes.
- Choose the population: Adults with type 2 diabetes.
- Define the setting: The outpatient clinic of a selected hospital.
- Choose the study focus: Glycaemic control and selected associated factors.
- Check feasibility: Can you access the patients and relevant clinical information?
- Review existing literature: What have previous studies found?
- Apply FINER: Is the question feasible, interesting, novel, ethical, and relevant?
Conclusion: A Good Question Builds a Strong Study
Medical research does not begin with complicated statistical tests or expensive laboratory equipment. It begins with careful observation, curiosity, and a problem worth investigating. A strong research question gives direction to the entire project. It helps the researcher choose suitable objectives, select an appropriate study design, determine the required data, and interpret the findings responsibly. PICO can help structure focused clinical comparison questions, while FINER helps determine whether a proposed question is worth pursuing and realistically achievable. Before preparing a questionnaire or recruiting participants, take time to ask one essential question: What exactly am I trying to find out, and can my proposed study answer it? That is where good medical research begins.Frequently Asked Questions
What is the first step in medical research?
Identify a clear research problem based on a clinical observation, public health concern, or gap in existing scientific knowledge. Then develop a focused research question.
What does PICO stand for in research?
PICO stands for Patient or Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome. It is commonly used to structure focused clinical questions, particularly those comparing interventions.
What does FINER mean?
FINER stands for Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, and Relevant. It is used to assess the quality and practicality of a proposed research question.
Does every medical research study need a hypothesis?
No. Many descriptive and exploratory studies are guided by research questions and objectives without requiring a formal hypothesis. Analytical and experimental studies commonly use hypotheses.
Can I conduct research on a topic that has already been studied?
Yes. A study may contribute useful evidence by investigating a different population, geographical setting, outcome, or methodological approach. A clear rationale and literature review are essential.
References and Further Reading
-
Back to the basics: guidance for formulating good research questions. (2024).
Read the article on PubMed Central -
Formulating the Research Question and Framing the Hypothesis.
Read the article on PubMed Central -
What every emergency physician should know about research: Introduction to a research primer for low- and middle-income countries.
Read the article on PubMed Central -
Biomedical Research: Formulating a Well-Built and Worth-Answering Research Question.
Read the article on PubMed Central -
World Health Organization. Constructing the Evidence Base on the Social Determinants of Health: A Guide.
Read the WHO guide
About Sudan Med Hub
Sudan Med Hub provides educational resources in medicine, scientific research, clinical learning, and examination preparation.
Sudan Med Hub — Learn • Practice • Excel.